Review: Re-brand, re-performances, and copies of a full-blown cinematic world, its inevitable that a movie like The Hunger Games in July and banality hysteria mainstream and post-Potter hunger simply Because of his pass there. Trilogy, adapted from the novel by Suzanne Collins, teen friendly, well-off The Hunger Games looks set to follow the footsteps of Harry Potter and the soon-to-be is the next big- money, low brow as the Twilight saga is linked to GCSE mass. In this adaptation of the first novel moderately engaging Collins pre-teen spin behaves like a Battle Royale. Director Gary Ross futuristic-retro rebellion, resistance, and the sense of wonder and eyes and mind of a 11 year olds, the target of the shooting. Much to see, but theres little absorption. Despite all efforts, does not really matter about.A hyped-up, cheesy and dumbed down to the treatise of human nature, spirit, freedom and TV culture, the Hunger Games character or a good scenario this one then ; thoroughly acted, explored much of a movie filled with action thats prophecies about living both literature and film over the years to build; nightmare, a dystopia where society is a slave to a tyrannical regime. But you know what? Theres a revolt on cards. And guess what? His only leads to an unlikely hero still inspiring. The Hunger Games is nothing new, then, but hold your horses; 24 children in a game pitting against each other to death a top secret island thats for sure one of the original ideas of compassion and pity reminiscent shock. Is not it? Yes, maybe, but not if you know your movies? If you do not see the shock and awe Battle Royale.A compensation bloody slice of social satire, Battle Royale was not the first to offer a glimpse of the oppressive world of fiction, where tra : People are forced to fight to the death. Sparticus, The Running Man, Gladiator, and also touched on the idea of a cock-fight in the slave society of a curved and are great fun. Suzanne Collins Battle Royale story might not be a rip-off, but there is an obvious source. Director Ross on the big screen retooling, The Hunger Games a frightening post-war America, whose totalitarian government to their kicks from legislation that was born from the ashes of World War III is set; Each of the 12 regions in the country to offer every young girl and boy-boy-foot wear it out live on tv last in the tournament are set to a virtual island This; a tribute to the sacrifice of the nation's thirst for blood and strife. In the early postwar punishment for a rebellion. A tribute to the power of the state; Games.The film Hunger Katniss (Jennifer Lawrence), steadfast teenager who put his life on the games when the games will replace her younger sister, he went on as a volunteer. The heroism and self-sacrifice Katniss and unwieldy What follows is a predictable love interest Peeta (Josh Hutcherson wood a) a narrative that they wined, dined, and then trained to be thrown into a giant lion, full of bloodthirsty brats who kills to win. Will you fall in love with Katniss and Peeta? They will both make it alive? If not, it will be one of them, the victor? Does it matter? The Hunger Games confident, self-important profit reaping film and potentially bleak and barbarous launched a danger that can not be realized through the screen, the atmosphere, the Because of its mild gore and violence is one of the pieces. Sorry, there is no quick handheld camera work and editing fights, scraps and blood of the effect is much to cover. It does not work. Hot and far; It does not take much to become a totalitarian conception of the future of young people's needs; everything will be just the depth, complexity and darkness, some guns, a little fire, a little love and you can throw some heartthrobs and laughing all the way to the bank. |
135 Seeds
93 Peers
No comments:
Post a Comment